ASSESSMENT OF LIVELIHOOD ASSETS OF FARMING HOUSEHOLDS AFFECTED BY 2010 FLOOD DISASTER IN SOKOTO STATE, NIGERIA
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The study assessed livelihood assets of farming households affected by the 2010 flood disaster in
Sokoto State, Nigeria. Purposive sampling was used in four stages to select the most flood-affected
farming communities in which 178 farming households were obtained as sample size for the study.
Interview schedule and checklist was used as research instruments for the study. Descriptive and
inferential statistics were used to analyse the qualitative data, while participatory rural appraisal tools
were used to obtain the quantitative data. Majority (63.5%) of the farming households had residential
buildings that were made of mud, which made the buildings highly vulnerable to adverse effects of
the 2010 flood disaster. Majority expressed that excessive rainfall (91.6%); excessive release of
water (92.1%) from Bakolori, Goronyo and Lugu dams caused the 2010 flood disaster. Also, the
fertile soils (46.1%), closeness to Rima and Sokoto Rivers (51.1%) utilised for lowland farming
(61.2%) was the farming households’ reasons for living in flood-affected areas. Livelihood assets lost
to the 2010 flood disaster in all the study LGAs were estimated to be N93,605,000 million,
Wamakko LGA had encountered the highest lost with mean value of N606,088 per households.
Assistance (45.5%), borrowing from non-affected families (55.1%), intervention from donor groups
(48.9%) and migration for livelihood alternatives (65.2%) were adopted for coping with stress caused
by the 2010 flood disaster. Analysis of Variance revealed a significant difference in the extent of
losses in monetary term among the study LGAs at 5% level of significance (F-Cal. = 7.12> F-Tab. =
1.32). The wealth ranking revealed that the quantity of food, livestock and fish was reduced due to
adverse effects of the 2010 flood disaster. Therefore, the study recommended that the concerned
stakeholders should expedite actions to control the adverse effects of flood disaster in the study area.
